| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Pentium G3260


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 207.1 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
35 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
58.89k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
11.73k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
10.45k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.55k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
3.83k (x0.37)
TOTAL
45.98k
30.56k (x0.66)

Multithread

i5-9500T

G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
22.99k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
20.53k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
8.82k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
6.55k (x1.64)
TOTAL
207.08k
58.89k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
2139 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3025 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
638 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
5917 points/W
1111 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3352 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4974 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2834 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
12427 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4