| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i7-10750H


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
4.69k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
18.71k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
5.84k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
13.95k (x1.32)
TOTAL
34.35k
43.19k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
18.79k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
86.1k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
27.42k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
5.27k (x1.28)
TOTAL
133.63k
137.58k (x1.03)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
16.63k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
24.17k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
6.38k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
13.69k (x1.31)
TOTAL
45.98k
60.87k (x1.32)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
67.07k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
107.95k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
27.05k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
5.07k (x1.27)
TOTAL
207.08k
207.14k (x1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
16.71k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
25.45k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
6.06k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
13.2k (x1.29)
TOTAL
48.64k
61.43k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
67.59k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
111.94k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
27.7k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.3k (x1.29)
TOTAL
211.7k
212.53k (x1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
29.06k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
26.49k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
6.23k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
13.89k (x1.29)
TOTAL
61.46k
75.67k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
154.61k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
151.34k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
36.33k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
6.93k (x1.7)
TOTAL
274.02k
349.21k (x1.27)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4