| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i5-7300HQ


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
3.41k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
14.14k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
4.41k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
8.87k (x0.84)
TOTAL
34.35k
30.83k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
12.75k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
52.88k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
16.25k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
8.98k (x2.18)
TOTAL
133.63k
90.85k (x0.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
11.71k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
16.74k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.27k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
7.81k (x0.74)
TOTAL
45.98k
40.53k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
44.38k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
62.55k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
15.6k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
7.85k (x1.96)
TOTAL
207.08k
130.38k (x0.63)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
11.59k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
17.89k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.14k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
7.88k (x0.77)
TOTAL
48.64k
41.5k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
44.42k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
67.5k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
14.6k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
8.06k (x1.96)
TOTAL
211.7k
134.58k (x0.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
21.65k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
19.18k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
4.38k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
8.3k (x0.77)
TOTAL
61.46k
53.51k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
77.12k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
68.68k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
15.24k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
7.78k (x1.91)
TOTAL
274.02k
168.81k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4