| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i5-6200U


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-6200U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.4 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
406e3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
38.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
81.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
17.06k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
15.24k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
3.35k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
3.22k (x0.3)
TOTAL
61.46k
38.87k (x0.63)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
35.68k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
33.68k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
7.74k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
4.09k (x1)
TOTAL
274.02k
81.18k (x0.3)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
2378 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
2245 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
272 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
5412 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6091 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5445 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
13882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4