| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i5-3320M


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 211.7 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.6 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
58.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
3.21k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
9.05k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
3.94k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
3.93k (x0.37)
TOTAL
34.35k
20.13k (x0.59)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
6.08k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
19.02k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
8.85k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
3.98k (x0.97)
TOTAL
133.63k
37.93k (x0.28)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
10.89k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
9.77k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
3.98k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
3.77k (x0.36)
TOTAL
45.98k
28.4k (x0.62)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
20.23k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
20.83k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
9.49k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
4.04k (x1.01)
TOTAL
207.08k
54.6k (x0.26)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
10.64k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
10.53k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.07k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
3.97k (x0.39)
TOTAL
48.64k
29.22k (x0.6)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
21.27k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
23.93k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
9.48k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.12k (x1)
TOTAL
211.7k
58.81k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2133 points/W
608 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3167 points/W
684 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
631 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
6049 points/W
1680 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5462 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2771 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
13145 points/GHz
8853 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4