| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i5-2500K


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 211.7 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
206a7
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
111.83k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
11.84k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
10.43k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.22k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
5.36k (x0.52)
TOTAL
48.64k
32.85k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
45.51k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
40.83k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
20.7k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.79k (x1.16)
TOTAL
211.7k
111.83k (x0.53)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
2133 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3167 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
631 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
6049 points/W
1177 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5462 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2771 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
13145 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4