| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i5-10400T


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.1 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
4k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
14.19k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
4.62k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
11.03k (x1.04)
TOTAL
34.35k
33.84k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
22.77k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
96.59k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
31.65k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
2.45k (x0.6)
TOTAL
133.63k
153.46k (x1.15)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
12.61k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
17.94k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.83k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
10.81k (x1.03)
TOTAL
45.98k
46.19k (x1)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
74.62k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
119.63k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
32.65k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
2.52k (x0.63)
TOTAL
207.08k
229.42k (x1.11)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
12.5k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
19.05k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.72k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
10.3k (x1)
TOTAL
48.64k
46.57k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
74.58k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
126.96k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
31.76k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
2.5k (x0.61)
TOTAL
211.7k
235.8k (x1.11)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
22k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
19.98k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
4.57k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
11.31k (x1.05)
TOTAL
61.46k
57.85k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
136.69k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
135.25k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
32.76k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
2.48k (x0.61)
TOTAL
274.02k
307.18k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4