Core i5-9500T vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
22.96k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
20.8k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
4.76k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
7.5k (x0.7)
TOTAL
61.46k
56.03k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-9500T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
66.43k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
62.38k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
14.52k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
4.45k (x1.09)
TOTAL
274.02k
147.78k (x0.54)
Performance/W
i5-9500T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4