| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 9 5900X


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900X is 3.1 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a20f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
12/24
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
840.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
24.34k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
26.8k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
12.12k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
26.55k (x2.47)
TOTAL
61.46k
89.82k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-9500T

5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
263.12k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
353.9k (x3.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
159.07k (x7.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
64.01k (x15.73)
TOTAL
274.02k
840.11k (x3.07)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
8001 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4