| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 7 5800X


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 2 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a20f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
558.42k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
24.14k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
26.3k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
12.09k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
26.54k (x2.47)
TOTAL
61.46k
89.07k (x1.45)

Multithread

i5-9500T

5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
183.54k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
237.27k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
107.95k (x4.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
29.66k (x7.29)
TOTAL
274.02k
558.42k (x2.04)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4