| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.6 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
3.78k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
16.42k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
4.75k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
5.51k (x0.52)
TOTAL
34.35k
30.46k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-9500T

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
15.18k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
74.87k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
27.85k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
6.08k (x1.48)
TOTAL
133.63k
123.97k (x0.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
13.72k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
22.93k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
4.99k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
5.27k (x0.49)
TOTAL
61.46k
46.91k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-9500T

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
50.54k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
93.33k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
25.25k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
6.07k (x1.49)
TOTAL
274.02k
175.18k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4