Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.6 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.6 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
4.25k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
19.72k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
5.84k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
21.36k (x2.02)
TOTAL
34.35k
51.17k (x1.49)
Multithread
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
35.04k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
181.42k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
64.86k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
8.21k (x2)
TOTAL
133.63k
289.54k (x2.17)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
15.22k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
24.12k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.87k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
21k (x2)
TOTAL
45.98k
66.21k (x1.44)
Multithread
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
126.81k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
229.86k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
61.74k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
9.77k (x2.44)
TOTAL
207.08k
428.19k (x2.07)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
14.44k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
24.92k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.8k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
19.07k (x1.86)
TOTAL
48.64k
64.24k (x1.32)
Multithread
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
122.01k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
220.34k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
59.89k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
9.9k (x2.4)
TOTAL
211.7k
412.13k (x1.95)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
15.34k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
25.75k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
5.79k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
17.95k (x1.67)
TOTAL
61.46k
64.83k (x1.05)
Multithread
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
123.07k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
239.3k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
60.6k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
8.18k (x2.01)
TOTAL
274.02k
431.14k (x1.57)
Performance/W
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4