| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
12.5k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
22.92k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.45k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
14.72k (x1.44)
TOTAL
48.64k
55.59k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-9500T

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
92.51k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
144.76k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
54.43k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
22.08k (x5.36)
TOTAL
211.7k
313.78k (x1.48)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
13.72k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
22.48k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
5.12k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
15.44k (x1.44)
TOTAL
61.46k
56.76k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-9500T

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
110.92k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
200.56k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
54.24k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
7.01k (x1.72)
TOTAL
274.02k
372.73k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4