| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 4.5 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
61.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
11.13k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
19.38k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
4.47k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
3.87k (x0.36)
TOTAL
61.46k
38.85k (x0.63)

Multithread

i5-9500T

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
17.13k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
30.56k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
9.44k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
4.09k (x1.01)
TOTAL
274.02k
61.23k (x0.22)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
4082 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4