Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
3.89k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
17.94k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
5.34k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
6.62k (x0.62)
TOTAL
34.35k
33.79k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
15.07k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
66.84k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
19.56k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
6.54k (x1.59)
TOTAL
133.63k
108.01k (x0.81)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
14.3k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
21.69k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.42k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
6.6k (x0.63)
TOTAL
45.98k
48k (x1.04)
Multithread
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
55.45k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
83.13k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
20.76k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
6.58k (x1.64)
TOTAL
207.08k
165.91k (x0.8)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
13.05k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
22.88k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.39k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
7.31k (x0.71)
TOTAL
48.64k
48.63k (x1)
Multithread
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
51.73k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
87.74k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
20.74k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
6.57k (x1.6)
TOTAL
211.7k
166.79k (x0.79)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
14.48k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
23.84k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
5.43k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
5.46k (x0.51)
TOTAL
61.46k
49.21k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
54.39k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
88.77k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
20.04k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
5.48k (x1.35)
TOTAL
274.02k
168.69k (x0.62)
Performance/W
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4