| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
4.26k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
19.54k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
10.95k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
11.08k (x1.05)
TOTAL
34.35k
45.84k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
15.69k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
68.3k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
33.66k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
12.16k (x2.96)
TOTAL
133.63k
129.81k (x0.97)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
14.48k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
24.18k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
11.95k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
11.01k (x1.05)
TOTAL
45.98k
61.62k (x1.34)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
50.98k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
80.7k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
36.61k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
12.02k (x3)
TOTAL
207.08k
180.32k (x0.87)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
16.27k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
25.74k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
11.5k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
10.82k (x1.06)
TOTAL
48.64k
64.32k (x1.32)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
54k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
88.76k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
35.23k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
12.14k (x2.95)
TOTAL
211.7k
190.12k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
22.97k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
21.61k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
8.99k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
8.52k (x0.79)
TOTAL
61.46k
62.1k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
82.75k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
86.58k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
29.34k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
11.72k (x2.88)
TOTAL
274.02k
210.4k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4