| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500 vs m7-6Y75


Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 268.8 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 5 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
406e3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Skylake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
65 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
53.58k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
10.24k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
15.33k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
2.97k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.5k
5.32k (x0.43)
TOTAL
58.69k
33.86k (x0.58)

Multithread

i5-9500

m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
92.21k
16.78k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
137.92k
25.09k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.12k
6.14k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.58k (x1)
TOTAL
268.8k
53.58k (x0.2)

Performance/W
i5-9500
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
509 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
4135 points/W
13395 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3667 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5495 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2842 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
13339 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4