| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500 vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 352.8 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.5 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/6
18/36
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
25344 kB
Date
April 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
4.52k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
18.43k
17.94k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.5k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.63k
9.64k (x0.76)
TOTAL
41.34k
37.6k (x0.91)

Multithread

i5-9500

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
24.75k
84.93k (x3.43)
Test#2 (FP)
103.1k
409.55k (x3.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.43k
122.88k (x3.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
22.12k (x3.98)
TOTAL
165.85k
639.48k (x3.86)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.06k
16.03k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
23.95k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.1k
6.03k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.79k
9.37k (x0.73)
TOTAL
58.14k
55.38k (x0.95)

Multithread

i5-9500

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
90.44k
316.11k (x3.5)
Test#2 (FP)
131.23k
503.75k (x3.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
131.82k (x3.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
22.24k (x3.98)
TOTAL
261.11k
973.92k (x3.73)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
16.4k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
20.97k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.82k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.5k
8.86k (x0.71)
TOTAL
58.69k
52.05k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-9500

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
92.21k
316.84k (x3.44)
Test#2 (FP)
137.92k
461.09k (x3.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.12k
129.82k (x3.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
22.09k (x3.97)
TOTAL
268.8k
929.85k (x3.46)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
29.17k
29.53k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
22.59k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.99k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.15k
10.22k (x0.78)
TOTAL
73.65k
68.33k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-9500

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
166.66k
587.06k (x3.52)
Test#2 (FP)
146.9k
496.41k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.04k
134.66k (x3.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
22.99k (x4.38)
TOTAL
352.84k
1241.12k (x3.52)

Performance/W
i5-9500
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
2564 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5428 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6629 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5793 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1327 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2990 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
16739 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4