| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500 vs Ryzen 7 5700G


Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5700G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 352.8 k points while the 5700G gets 467.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
84.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
467.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
29.17k
23.02k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
25.22k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
11.56k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.15k
24.6k (x1.87)
TOTAL
73.65k
84.4k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-9500

5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
166.66k
152.53k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
146.9k
208.8k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.04k
95.22k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
11.15k (x2.12)
TOTAL
352.84k
467.69k (x1.33)

Performance/W
i5-9500
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
2564 points/W
2347 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
3212 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/W
1465 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
5428 points/W
7195 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
6629 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5793 points/GHz
5483 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1327 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2990 points/GHz
5348 points/GHz
TOTAL
16739 points/GHz
18348 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4