| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500 vs Ryzen 7 3800X


Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 352.8 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
497.74k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
4.47k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.43k
17.41k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
8.23k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.63k
25.15k (x1.99)
TOTAL
41.34k
55.26k (x1.34)

Multithread

i5-9500

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.75k
36.1k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
103.1k
178.65k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.43k
95.98k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
16.03k (x2.88)
TOTAL
165.85k
326.76k (x1.97)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.06k
17.17k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
25.32k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.1k
8.36k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.79k
27.86k (x2.18)
TOTAL
58.14k
78.71k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-9500

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
90.44k
136.06k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
131.23k
195.06k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
97.81k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
12.91k (x2.31)
TOTAL
261.11k
441.85k (x1.69)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
16.76k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
25.16k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
8.76k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.5k
24.3k (x1.94)
TOTAL
58.69k
74.98k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-9500

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.21k
131.36k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
137.92k
198.51k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.12k
97.27k (x2.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
13.4k (x2.41)
TOTAL
268.8k
440.54k (x1.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.17k
17.1k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
26.59k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
8.91k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.15k
23.21k (x1.76)
TOTAL
73.65k
75.81k (x1.03)

Multithread

i5-9500

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
166.66k
172.04k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
146.9k
214.03k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.04k
97.1k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
14.57k (x2.77)
TOTAL
352.84k
497.74k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i5-9500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2564 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5428 points/W
4740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6629 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5793 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1327 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2990 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16739 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4