| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500 vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 352.8 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 2 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
3.78k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
18.43k
16.42k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.75k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.63k
5.51k (x0.44)
TOTAL
41.34k
30.46k (x0.74)

Multithread

i5-9500

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.75k
15.18k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
103.1k
74.87k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.43k
27.85k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
6.08k (x1.09)
TOTAL
165.85k
123.97k (x0.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.17k
13.72k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
22.93k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.99k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.15k
5.27k (x0.4)
TOTAL
73.65k
46.91k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-9500

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
166.66k
50.54k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
146.9k
93.33k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.04k
25.25k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
6.07k (x1.15)
TOTAL
352.84k
175.18k (x0.5)

Performance/W
i5-9500
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2564 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5428 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6629 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5793 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1327 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2990 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
16739 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4