| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500 vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 352.8 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
431.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
4.25k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
18.43k
19.72k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.84k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.63k
21.36k (x1.69)
TOTAL
41.34k
51.17k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-9500

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.75k
35.04k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
103.1k
181.42k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.43k
64.86k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
8.21k (x1.48)
TOTAL
165.85k
289.54k (x1.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.06k
15.22k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
24.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.1k
5.87k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.79k
21k (x1.64)
TOTAL
58.14k
66.21k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-9500

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
90.44k
126.81k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
131.23k
229.86k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
61.74k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
9.77k (x1.75)
TOTAL
261.11k
428.19k (x1.64)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
14.44k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
24.92k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.8k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.5k
19.07k (x1.53)
TOTAL
58.69k
64.24k (x1.09)

Multithread

i5-9500

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.21k
122.01k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
137.92k
220.34k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.12k
59.89k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
9.9k (x1.78)
TOTAL
268.8k
412.13k (x1.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.17k
15.34k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
25.75k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.79k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.15k
17.95k (x1.36)
TOTAL
73.65k
64.83k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-9500

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
166.66k
123.07k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
146.9k
239.3k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.04k
60.6k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
8.18k (x1.56)
TOTAL
352.84k
431.14k (x1.22)

Performance/W
i5-9500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2564 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5428 points/W
4106 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6629 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5793 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1327 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2990 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
16739 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4