Core i5-9500 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 352.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.8 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 352.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.8 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
3.8k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
18.43k
17.38k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.17k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.63k
3.16k (x0.25)
TOTAL
41.34k
29.52k (x0.71)
Multithread
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.75k
15.28k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
103.1k
76.44k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.43k
27.48k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
3.02k (x0.54)
TOTAL
165.85k
122.2k (x0.74)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.06k
13.95k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
20.7k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.1k
5.33k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.79k
3.03k (x0.24)
TOTAL
58.14k
43.01k (x0.74)
Multithread
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
90.44k
58.56k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
131.23k
92.95k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
28.55k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
2.98k (x0.53)
TOTAL
261.11k
183.04k (x0.7)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
13.04k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
22.35k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.37k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.5k
3.4k (x0.27)
TOTAL
58.69k
44.15k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
92.21k
56.49k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
137.92k
100.74k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.12k
28.21k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
3.04k (x0.55)
TOTAL
268.8k
188.49k (x0.7)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
29.17k
14.2k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
23.23k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.35k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.15k
5.18k (x0.39)
TOTAL
73.65k
47.96k (x0.65)
Multithread
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
166.66k
58.24k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
146.9k
105.72k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.04k
28.73k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.59k (x1.06)
TOTAL
352.84k
198.27k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2564 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
5428 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6629 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5793 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1327 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2990 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16739 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4