| | | | | | |

Core i5-9400F vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
50654
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
67.77k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
331.19k points
281.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9400F
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
27.15k
18.78k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
16.25k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.38k
3.99k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.61k
6.8k (x0.59)
TOTAL
67.77k
45.82k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-9400F

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
156.61k
133.55k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
138k
108.43k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.45k
30.02k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
9.48k (x1.33)
TOTAL
331.19k
281.48k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i5-9400F
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2409 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2123 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
5095 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9400F
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6622 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5763 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2831 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
16528 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4