Core i5-9400F vs i7-10510U
Description
The i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.7 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.7 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.77k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
331.19k points
190.82k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9400F
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.15k
22.85k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
21.15k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.38k
4.78k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.61k
10.24k (x0.88)
TOTAL
67.77k
59.01k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-9400F
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
156.61k
86.08k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
138k
79.78k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.45k
18.26k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
6.69k (x0.94)
TOTAL
331.19k
190.82k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i5-9400F
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
2409 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2123 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
5095 points/W
12721 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9400F
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
6622 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5763 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2831 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
16528 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4