Core i5-9400F vs i5-4670K
Description
The i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-4670K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 2.4 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 2.4 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
67.77k points
42.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
331.19k points
140.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9400F
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
27.15k
21.79k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
11.49k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.38k
4.73k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.61k
4.25k (x0.37)
TOTAL
67.77k
42.25k (x0.62)
Multithread
i5-9400F
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
156.61k
75.9k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
138k
40.88k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.45k
17.08k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
6.32k (x0.89)
TOTAL
331.19k
140.18k (x0.42)
Performance/W
i5-9400F
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
2409 points/W
904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2123 points/W
487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
203 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
5095 points/W
1669 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9400F
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
6622 points/GHz
5735 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5763 points/GHz
3023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2831 points/GHz
1117 points/GHz
TOTAL
16528 points/GHz
11120 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4