Core i5-9400F vs i3-10105
Description
The i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.77k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
331.19k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
27.15k
28.9k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
25.85k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.38k
5.88k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.61k
8.29k (x0.71)
TOTAL
67.77k
68.92k (x1.02)
Multithread
i5-9400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
156.61k
111.69k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
138k
110.23k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.45k
28.45k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
3.56k (x0.5)
TOTAL
331.19k
253.93k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i5-9400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2409 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2123 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5095 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6622 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5763 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2831 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16528 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4