Core i5-9400F vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.77k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
331.19k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.15k
20.37k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
22.52k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.38k
10.18k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.61k
21.49k (x1.85)
TOTAL
67.77k
74.56k (x1.1)
Multithread
i5-9400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
156.61k
144.01k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
138k
191.86k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.45k
84.53k (x2.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
6.5k (x0.91)
TOTAL
331.19k
426.9k (x1.29)
Performance/W
i5-9400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2409 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2123 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
5095 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6622 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5763 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2831 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16528 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4