Core i5-9400F vs i7-1165G7
Description
The i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.77k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
331.19k points
210.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9400F
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
27.15k
22.97k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
21.61k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.38k
8.99k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.61k
8.52k (x0.73)
TOTAL
67.77k
62.1k (x0.92)
Multithread
i5-9400F
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
156.61k
82.75k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
138k
86.58k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.45k
29.34k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
11.72k (x1.64)
TOTAL
331.19k
210.4k (x0.64)
Performance/W
i5-9400F
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2409 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2123 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
5095 points/W
7514 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9400F
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6622 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5763 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2831 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16528 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4