| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
406f1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
2.6k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
7.55k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
2.61k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
2.03k (x0.33)
TOTAL
27.05k
14.79k (x0.55)

Multithread

i5-9300H

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
17.41k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
75.46k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
26.25k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
4.65k (x1.2)
TOTAL
80.54k
123.78k (x1.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
12.16k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
11.82k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
3.02k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
2.4k (x0.2)
TOTAL
67.57k
29.39k (x0.44)

Multithread

i5-9300H

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
103.77k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
102.28k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
26.13k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
5.65k (x0.73)
TOTAL
244.1k
237.83k (x0.97)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4