| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.7 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
45 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
3.45k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
9.96k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
4.26k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
4.27k (x0.69)
TOTAL
27.05k
21.94k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-9300H

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
14.01k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
37.68k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
17.05k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
7.35k (x1.89)
TOTAL
80.54k
76.09k (x0.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
19.17k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
10.55k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
4.79k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
4.65k (x0.39)
TOTAL
67.57k
39.16k (x0.58)

Multithread

i5-9300H

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
73.13k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
42.06k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
18.03k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
7.54k (x0.97)
TOTAL
244.1k
140.76k (x0.58)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4