Core i5-9300H vs Core 2 Quad Q9550
Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the Q9550 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 80.5 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.6 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 80.5 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.6 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
1067a
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Yorkfield
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.833 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.833 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12288 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2008
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
17.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
48.98k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
2.6k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
6.67k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
2.72k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
4.43k (x0.71)
TOTAL
27.05k
16.42k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-9300H
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
9.92k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
25.37k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
10.31k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.37k (x0.87)
TOTAL
80.54k
48.96k (x0.61)
Performance/W
i5-9300H
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
104 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1067 points/W
267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
379 points/W
109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
1790 points/W
515 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
824 points/GHz
917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/GHz
2356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1519 points/GHz
1565 points/GHz
TOTAL
6597 points/GHz
5797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4