| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i7-3770K


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 80.5 k points while the i7-3770K gets 97.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-3770K is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
36.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
133.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
3.86k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
10.79k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
4.9k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
5.51k (x0.88)
TOTAL
27.05k
25.06k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
17.17k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
46.25k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
23.67k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
10.36k (x2.67)
TOTAL
80.54k
97.44k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
223 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1067 points/W
601 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
379 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
1790 points/W
1265 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
824 points/GHz
990 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/GHz
2768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
1256 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1519 points/GHz
1412 points/GHz
TOTAL
6597 points/GHz
6426 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4