| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i5-7200U


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
806e9
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
97.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
3.15k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
12.85k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
4.14k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
5.21k (x0.84)
TOTAL
27.05k
25.36k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
6.28k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
29.27k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
9.31k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
4.71k (x1.21)
TOTAL
80.54k
49.56k (x0.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
19.34k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
17.47k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
4.08k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
4.04k (x0.34)
TOTAL
67.57k
44.94k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
42.86k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
41.3k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
9.69k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
3.68k (x0.48)
TOTAL
244.1k
97.52k (x0.4)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
6501 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4