| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i5-2400


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 80.5 k points while the i5-2400 gets 58.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-2400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
206a7
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
25.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
84.36k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
2.72k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
7.6k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
3.98k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
4.47k (x0.72)
TOTAL
27.05k
18.78k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
10.37k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
28.84k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
15.08k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
4.67k (x1.2)
TOTAL
80.54k
58.95k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
109 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1067 points/W
304 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
379 points/W
159 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
1790 points/W
620 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
824 points/GHz
801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/GHz
2236 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1519 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
TOTAL
6597 points/GHz
5523 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4