Core i5-9300H vs i3-4160
Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 80.5 k points while the i3-4160 gets 51.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.6 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 80.5 k points while the i3-4160 gets 51.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.6 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
4.13k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
10.33k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
4.64k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
3.95k (x0.63)
TOTAL
27.05k
23.06k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-9300H
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
7.46k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
26.62k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
11.46k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
6.27k (x1.61)
TOTAL
80.54k
51.81k (x0.64)
Performance/W
i5-9300H
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1067 points/W
493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
379 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
1790 points/W
959 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
824 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/GHz
2869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1519 points/GHz
1098 points/GHz
TOTAL
6597 points/GHz
6405 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4