| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs Ryzen 9 4900HS


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.5 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
360.57k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
14.87k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
21.53k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
8.39k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
8.21k (x0.68)
TOTAL
67.57k
53k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-9300H

4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
124.63k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
158.62k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
69.79k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
7.53k (x0.97)
TOTAL
244.1k
360.57k (x1.48)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
10302 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4