| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.7 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
140.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
3.24k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
13.16k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
4.41k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
3.32k (x0.53)
TOTAL
27.05k
24.12k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-9300H

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
12.95k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
57.84k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
21.05k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.51k (x0.9)
TOTAL
80.54k
95.36k (x1.18)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
10.88k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
18.09k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
4.29k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
3.36k (x0.28)
TOTAL
67.57k
36.64k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-9300H

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
42.44k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
73.82k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
20.76k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
3.96k (x0.51)
TOTAL
244.1k
140.97k (x0.58)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
9398 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4