Core i5-9300H vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
15.75k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
26.29k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.91k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
18.48k (x1.53)
TOTAL
67.57k
66.44k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-9300H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
94.49k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
182.53k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
45.95k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
10.15k (x1.31)
TOTAL
244.1k
333.12k (x1.36)
Performance/W
i5-9300H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4