| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
3.41k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
15.96k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
4.69k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
17.42k (x2.8)
TOTAL
27.05k
41.47k (x1.53)

Multithread

i5-9300H

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
20.88k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
110.37k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
39.25k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
6.66k (x1.72)
TOTAL
80.54k
177.16k (x2.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
13.83k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
23.16k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.15k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
15.18k (x1.26)
TOTAL
67.57k
57.33k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-9300H

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
83.44k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
161.53k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
40.62k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
6.72k (x0.87)
TOTAL
244.1k
292.31k (x1.2)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4