| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500T vs Xeon X5675


Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 203.4 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 1.6 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
206c2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/6
6 /12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2018
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
124.92k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8500T
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
8.77k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.61k
5.82k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
3.47k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
2.98k (x0.3)
TOTAL
46.36k
21.04k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-8500T

X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
71.15k
53.23k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
102.74k
39.35k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.6k
27.05k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.9k
5.28k (x1.82)
TOTAL
203.39k
124.92k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i5-8500T
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
2033 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
760 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5811 points/W
1315 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3695 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5318 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1360 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
13245 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4