| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500T vs i5-10500


Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 251.8 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
387.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8500T
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.52k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
14.76k
18.52k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
5.58k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.72k
14.2k (x1.63)
TOTAL
31.5k
42.82k (x1.36)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
25.26k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
82.35k
120.48k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.6k
38.12k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.97k
7.68k (x2.59)
TOTAL
129.29k
191.54k (x1.48)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
16.3k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
18.61k
23.22k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
6.22k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
14.05k (x1.4)
TOTAL
46.36k
59.79k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
71.15k
92.61k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
102.74k
147.68k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.6k
40.71k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.9k
7.78k (x2.69)
TOTAL
203.39k
288.77k (x1.42)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
16.33k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
19.47k
24.73k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
5.99k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.6k
13.64k (x1.42)
TOTAL
46.6k
60.69k (x1.3)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
71.25k
91.64k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
91.16k
158.71k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.45k
39.84k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
7.76k (x2.72)
TOTAL
189.71k
297.94k (x1.57)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
23.13k
28.73k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
26.01k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
6.08k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
14.46k (x1.35)
TOTAL
59.27k
75.27k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
125.17k
172.66k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
98.07k
167.57k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.57k
39.45k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
8.31k (x2.76)
TOTAL
251.82k
387.99k (x1.54)

Performance/W
i5-8500T
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2802 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
731 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
5969 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
6608 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5914 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
16934 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4