| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500T vs i5-10400T


Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 251.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i5-8500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
14.76k
14.19k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
4.62k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.72k
11.03k (x1.26)
TOTAL
31.5k
33.84k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
22.77k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
82.35k
96.59k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.6k
31.65k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.97k
2.45k (x0.83)
TOTAL
129.29k
153.46k (x1.19)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
12.61k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
18.61k
17.94k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.83k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
10.81k (x1.08)
TOTAL
46.36k
46.19k (x1)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
71.15k
74.62k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
102.74k
119.63k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.6k
32.65k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.9k
2.52k (x0.87)
TOTAL
203.39k
229.42k (x1.13)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
12.5k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
19.47k
19.05k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
4.72k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.6k
10.3k (x1.07)
TOTAL
46.6k
46.57k (x1)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
71.25k
74.58k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
91.16k
126.96k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.45k
31.76k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
2.5k (x0.88)
TOTAL
189.71k
235.8k (x1.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.13k
22k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
19.98k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
4.57k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
11.31k (x1.05)
TOTAL
59.27k
57.85k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
125.17k
136.69k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
98.07k
135.25k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.57k
32.76k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
2.48k (x0.82)
TOTAL
251.82k
307.18k (x1.22)

Performance/W
i5-8500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2802 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
731 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6608 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5914 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
16934 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4