| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500T vs i3-3240


Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-3240 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 189.7 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 3.8 times faster than the i3-3240 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2018
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
24.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
49.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
8.46k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.47k
10.69k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
3.09k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.6k
2.23k (x0.23)
TOTAL
46.6k
24.48k (x0.53)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
71.25k
17.92k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
91.16k
21.21k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.45k
7.77k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
2.8k (x0.98)
TOTAL
189.71k
49.7k (x0.26)

Performance/W
i5-8500T
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
2036 points/W
326 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2604 points/W
386 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
699 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
5420 points/W
904 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
3691 points/GHz
2490 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
3145 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1320 points/GHz
910 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2742 points/GHz
655 points/GHz
TOTAL
13315 points/GHz
7200 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4