| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500T vs Celeron N5095


Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 203.4 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 2.2 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906c0
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2018
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
93.26k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8500T
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
10.08k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
18.61k
10.11k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.06k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
2.36k (x0.23)
TOTAL
46.36k
26.6k (x0.57)

Multithread

i5-8500T

N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
71.15k
36.86k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
102.74k
38.51k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.6k
15.17k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.9k
2.72k (x0.94)
TOTAL
203.39k
93.26k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i5-8500T
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2033 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
760 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
5811 points/W
6217 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3695 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5318 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1360 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
13245 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4