| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500T vs Ryzen 7 4800U


Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4800U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 251.8 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
57.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
356.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8500T
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.13k
16.53k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
24.67k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
9.04k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
7.68k (x0.72)
TOTAL
59.27k
57.92k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-8500T

4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
125.17k
121.96k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
98.07k
162.82k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.57k
68.25k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
3.79k (x1.26)
TOTAL
251.82k
356.81k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-8500T
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/W
8131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2802 points/W
10854 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
731 points/W
4550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
252 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
23788 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
6608 points/GHz
3936 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5914 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
2153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
16934 points/GHz
13790 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4