| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500T vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 251.8 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2018
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8500T
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.13k
22.16k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
24.46k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
10.71k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
22.44k (x2.09)
TOTAL
59.27k
79.76k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-8500T

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
125.17k
112.5k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
98.07k
153.92k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.57k
67.75k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
11.47k (x3.81)
TOTAL
251.82k
345.64k (x1.37)

Performance/W
i5-8500T
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2802 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
731 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
6608 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5914 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
16934 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4