Core i5-8500T vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 251.8 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 1.6 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 251.8 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 1.6 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2018
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8500T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.13k
13.75k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
22.58k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
4.99k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
3.55k (x0.33)
TOTAL
59.27k
44.87k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-8500T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
125.17k
50.99k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
98.07k
84.4k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.57k
18.95k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
3.2k (x1.06)
TOTAL
251.82k
157.54k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i5-8500T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2802 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
731 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6608 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5914 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
16934 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4