| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500 vs i5-10400T


Description
The i5-8500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500 gets a score of 307.5 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500 is 1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.09k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.52k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.19k
4k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
14.19k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.46k
4.62k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
11.03k (x0.92)
TOTAL
38.96k
33.84k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-8500

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.67k
22.77k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
94.07k
96.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.05k
31.65k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
2.45k (x0.56)
TOTAL
155.18k
153.46k (x0.99)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
12.61k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
17.94k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
4.83k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.17k
10.81k (x0.89)
TOTAL
55.17k
46.19k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-8500

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
87.78k
74.62k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
126.73k
119.63k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.93k
32.65k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
2.52k (x0.6)
TOTAL
251.65k
229.42k (x0.91)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.21k
12.5k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.94k
19.05k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
4.72k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.39k
10.3k (x0.9)
TOTAL
55.07k
46.57k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-8500

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
79.52k
74.58k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
107.78k
126.96k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.89k
31.76k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.37k
2.5k (x0.19)
TOTAL
232.55k
235.8k (x1.01)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.36k
22k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.27k
19.98k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.69k
4.57k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
11.31k (x0.96)
TOTAL
69.09k
57.85k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-8500

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
144.77k
136.69k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
129.04k
135.25k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.53k
32.76k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
2.48k (x0.59)
TOTAL
307.52k
307.18k (x1)

Performance/W
i5-8500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2227 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1985 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
454 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
4731 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6673 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5920 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1388 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2870 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
16850 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4