Core i5-8365U vs i3-7100
Description
The i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 1.6 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 1.6 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906e9
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
59.73k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
197.46k points
126.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8365U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.37k
25.77k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.68k
23.26k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.43k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.7k
4.09k (x0.53)
TOTAL
59.73k
58.55k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-8365U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
89.45k
54.98k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
85.57k
54.73k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.02k
13.12k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
3.65k (x1.07)
TOTAL
197.46k
126.47k (x0.64)
Performance/W
i5-8365U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
5964 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
13164 points/W
2480 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8365U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
5944 points/GHz
6607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5531 points/GHz
5964 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1214 points/GHz
1393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1879 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
14568 points/GHz
15014 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4